SKU-5 is the capsule's 'quiet heirloom' piece — Bode/Kapital/Visvim register. Overnight sprint committed 3 Heritage Patch variants (A heritage / B botanical / C institutional) in commit 2069f32 and recommended Variant A. But the underlying art-direction question is broader: is the SKU-5 hero a Heritage Patch (fake-archival object) or an ê wink (floating circumflex, minimalist brand mark)? That's the fork.
Options
A · Heritage Patch, Variant ARECOMMENDED
DTF transfer OR woven patch (execution method decision nested below). Warm-cream #B8A894 ground, serif title, 'EST. NEW YORK · MMXXIII', 'À rêvasser' motto, lot/serial footer. Passes Bode-fan trompe-l'œil test.
B · ê Wink (Accent 1)
DTF soft-hand, centered chest ~15cm wide, floating ê circumflex only. Minimalist, brand-mark-forward. Too thin for the capsule's heirloom slot; works better as secondary motif elsewhere.
Inside Option A · Execution method
Operator's 2:55 AM Slack drop flagged NY Custom Labels (same vendor as neck labels) as possibly doing woven patches. A woven patch ships from the same vendor as the neck labels, one artwork handoff, marginal cost ~$25/unit at 20 units, reads as archival object rather than ink on cotton. This is a second-order decision inside Option A — commit to art first, execution method second. NY Custom Labels $1 sample pack arriving Tuesday T-22 resolves this.
Agent recommendation
A (Heritage Patch, Variant A)
Two reasons: (1) the sprint already committed 3 rendered variants + verdict notes, so A is closest to shipping; (2) the trompe-l'œil/fake-archival register is load-bearing for the brand's whole 'archival-adjacent, not archival-replica' thesis per the sprint's closing insight. ê wink has a better home as nape detail on SKU-2 or as capsule-wide secondary accent.
Resolving this unblocks
- SKU-5 photography direction (chest-left intimate patch vs centered wink)
- Final production-playbook SKU-5 decoration spec (currently UNKNOWN)
- PDP-05 hero composite rebuild
- SKU-5 primary motif for production tracker